Therefore it is not unreasonable for a person to start smoking. It’s like driving a car; people die in car accidents every day, but the odds are that you will not die in one. But does that mean smoking isnot un-healthy? Of course not. Cars themselves do not cause accidents; people driving the cars cause the accidents. This is the same as smoking. The people smoking the cigarettes cause the cancer, just based on the simple fact that cigarettes must be lit and smoke in order to realease its deadly fumes and toxins. Those who become addicted to smoking and acquire no illnesses are the lucky ones. Also, many people feel that cigarettes companies target teenagers with manipulative advertising, portraying smokers as cool, healthy looking people. Teenagers are easily manipulatable and impressionable, so they could easily fall for the tobacco companies "tricks". Yet the fact remains; smoking kills. It kills people who smoke and people who don’t smoke. A victim of second-hand smoke could potentially sue a smoker for murder, because the cigarettes slowly killed the non-smoker. Therefore, the question remains: Should legislation exist that limits smokers rights? Smokers harm the environment by causing ETS and kill people who do not smoke. However, smokers are people too and should not, under these circumstances, have their civil rights violated. Smokers obviously do not want to harm the environment and other people because they smoke for personal reasons. Still, the question remains; should laws be written that limits smokers’ rights? This website will present both sides of the story, providing links to websites for each side and articles relating to the topic at hand.

cigarettes have been reported to ease, and in some cases, to stop the low to moderate chemical and or gas vapor induced lung and cardiac spasms. These spasms could cause instant death; in emphysema, asthma, C.O.P.D., CHF and cardiac arrithymia patients. I would like to see more research done on this, because I am convinced that the organic tissue, violently rejecting a chemical or gas vapor invasion, would be soothed by the counter-induction of organic vapor. The positive, expandable components, of the organic, super ceding the densifying and contracting physics of the negative. But this is only my personal, scientific theory of how cigarettes could actually be serviceable, as a health benefit, if left untampered with. If we could all do an honest facts reality check and stop the false information, and terroristic rhetoric, the smokers would be healthier, The non-smokers would be safe and secure from any paranoia of being around smokes online or tax free cigarettes , and the manufacturers would be free of law suits and diminishing market share profit percentages. That would be the wisest solution for the satisfaction of everyone. And it would end the discrimination and dangers of paranoia. There might be one unhappy camper left, and that would be the chemical manufacturers and pharmaceuticals sales to sick patients, but ….they created the additives, the harmful to humans insecticides, disinfectants, solvents, etc…etc…etc. To that, the wise old sage, “KhanDawnUs” say; “the dog who bites….could end up with bloody tail.” I would hope that they would redirect their focus to preventative health enhancement, by producing safer protective products. We all know that health benefiting microbes are destroyed, along with the dangerous microbes, when using current remedies. Bulletins, against excessive use of antibacterial agents, were published. This is because there is no such thing as a dangerous microbe, of itself. Dangerous microbes are merely normal microbes malfunctioning. It is usually an invasive episode, into the microbe, of a toxic agent (antibacterial) or negative energy, that creates a sub-atomic molecular clustering, inside the microbe. These clog the emission of gas, that it produces by converting waste material that it has ingested from us. The gas is obstructed, from escaping the body of the microbe and it is required to accomplish osmosis, of the microbe, moving in and out through solid matter walls of our cells, veins and arteries. The microbe delivers nutrients and removes waste, as a cleaning service for us. When they become sick or malfunctioning, they clump into tumors and clog cells, veins and arteries, of the humans. More effort must be made to expand the populations of healthy microbes in the environment and in the physical body. Cigarette smoke and organic cleansers would actually clean the air and enhance the home environment, for optimal equilibrium and physical health functioning. These gifted researchers have the ability to produce the greatest benefit to the human species…….LIFE.

As a non-smoker, I have the right to breathe clean air and not have cigarettes smoke blown into my face. I also have the right to not see cigarettes butts lying all over the grounds of ABAC. However, just as I know I have these rights, I also respect the rights of those who choose to smoke and to do so in a manner that will not jeopardize their safety. New rules for Place Properties have restricted smoking areas to across the street on the corner beside the baseball field. I think this is unfair to the smokers. There is hardly any light at this corner and the residents of Place Properties did not get to voice their opinion before this rule was handed down. I can see that Place Properties wants to keep their grounds looking nice, but at what cost do they have that right? If these girls have to go across the street to smoke a cigarette, it could cost them more than their health. It could cost them their safety, too. These residents could be abducted, hit by a passing car or worse. The location is far enough away from the building so if something were to happen no one would be able to notice any commotion. Literally, no one can hear you scream. Both parties need to show respect for one another. I have no problem with residents smoking outside the doors of ABAC Place if it is away from the entrances. I have not had any problem at all with this so far. I have a roommate who is a smoker and she smokes away from the doors in an open area. I know this for a fact because I walk downstairs and talk with her while she smokes. I haven’t smelt smoke once while outside with her, and I am sensitive to cigarette smoke. However, one day when it was raining, my roommate was under the outside stairs so she wouldn’t get wet, smoking, when a girl came over and harassed her about her supposed cloud of smoke that she couldn’t seemingly avoid. All this just because she was a fanatical non-smoker. I can see that the non-smoker did not want to breathe in smoke, but where was my roommate supposed to go? Why couldn’t the non-smoker walk around her? Yes, that was a non-smoking area, but common sense has to be used.